Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1116 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-4160 - 109 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 24 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
