Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 514 days older than Ryzen 5 3500U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 3500U - 181 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Ryzen 5 3500U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
