Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i7-4712MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1579 days newer than Core i7-4712MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 13% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i7-4712MQ - 105 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4712MQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4712MQ
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Core i7-4712MQ
Mobile • Apr 14th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X | vs | Intel Core i7-4712MQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 14th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 37 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
