Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1074 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than EPYC 7551P - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 64 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
Haswell | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |