Key Differences
In short — Core i3-390M outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-390M is 694 days older than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-390M
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-390M | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |