Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 64% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €18.29 vs €50.95
- Up to 63% better value when playing Valheim than Celeron G3930 - €0.1 vs €0.27 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i3-3220 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 51 vs 55 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €18.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |