Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2361 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 8% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-760 - 256 vs 236 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 61% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - €19.99 vs €50.95
- Up to 60% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3930 - €0.08 vs €0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
236
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |