Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1125G4 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1125G4 is 287 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Performs up to 6% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - 188 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Athlon 3000G - 28 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
178
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12476 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
28 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |