Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 8% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-7100T - 133 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €110.03 vs €151.33
- Up to 22% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Core i3-10320 - €0.89 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
78%
Price, €
€151.33
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15175 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
123
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€110.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €110.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |