Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 2042 than FX-4100 - 164 vs 143 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €22.88 vs €151.33
- Up to 83% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-10320 - €0.16 vs €0.92 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
17%
Price, €
€151.33
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |