Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 69% better in The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-760 - 122 vs 72 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - €22.37 vs €155.51
- Up to 76% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i3-10320 - €0.31 vs €1.27 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.27/FPS
24.409448818897637%
Price, €
€155.51
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €155.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1551 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
72
59.01639344262295%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€22.37
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €22.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1542 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Single-Core
457
29.69460688758934%
Multi-Core
1280
27.669693039342846%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i5-760 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |