Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 482 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Athlon 3000G - 202 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €83.52 vs €113.24
- Up to 25% better value when playing Control than Core i3-10105 - €0.42 vs €0.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
74%
Price, €
€113.24
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8347 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
200
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€83.52
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €83.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8349 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Comet Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |