Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3195 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i3-2100 - 153 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 87% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €10.59 vs €82.24
- Up to 87% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Athlon 3000G - €0.07 vs €0.54 per FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13623 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
FPS
144
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€10.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €10.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-2100 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 20th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |