Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4237 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i7-875K - 180 vs 153 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
180
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |