Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $353
Availability
MSRP in USD: $353
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1920 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-875K - 118 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
118
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-875K
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
