Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1587 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 6% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 264 vs 248 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €78.7 vs €379.64
- Up to 80% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.3 vs €1.53 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
264
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
248
93%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
19%
Price, €
€379.64
20%
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |