Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10850K is 526 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - €78.7 vs €342.73
- Up to 77% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i9-10850K - €0.43 vs €1.85 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Celeron G6900 - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
183
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €78.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.85/FPS
23%
Price, €
€342.73
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €342.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |