Buy on Amazon
€379.64
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1917 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in God of War than Celeron G550 - 171 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen ™ Threadripper 1900X, S TR4, 8 core, 16 fili, 3,8 GHz, 4,0 GHz Turbo, 20 MB, 64 linee, 180 W, CPU, vendita al dettaglio
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
