Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 456 days newer than Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G530 - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G530 - 55 vs 65 Watts
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |