Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2636 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 14% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron B830 - 99 vs 87 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
99
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €82.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17779 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B830 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |