Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 337 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Intel Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron B815 - 199 vs 198 FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron B815 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |