Buy on Amazon
€158.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2760 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 11% better in DOOM Eternal than Celeron 847 - 487 vs 440 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 6 vs 2 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
487
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-9400F processore 2,9 GHz Box 9 MB Smart Cache
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 108 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Celeron 847
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
