Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1225 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6100 - 555 vs 532 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - €158.88 vs €168.88
- Up to 9% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-6100 - €0.29 vs €0.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
555
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18019 minutes ago
Buy for €168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18019 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |