Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 3558 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 7% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron 847 - 224 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 12 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
224
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€163.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €163.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |