Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3558 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 293% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron 847 - 55 vs 14 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2389 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |