Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2940 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 16% better in Ready or Not than Celeron 847 - 258 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€87.63
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €87.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2388 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |