Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Celeron 847 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2636 days newer than Celeron 847.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Athlon 200GE - 17 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron 847 - 170 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 847 - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 19th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 847 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
1.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |