Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 48 days older than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 17 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 1% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron 1007U - 187 vs 185 FPS
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 330 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |