Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400 outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3360 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 204 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 41% cheaper than FX-8350 - €168.57 vs €285.00
- Up to 51% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - €0.83 vs €1.70 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7388 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €168.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7388 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8350 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |