Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of FX-8350
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €285.00 vs €485.00
- Up to 32% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-14900KF - €1.24 vs €1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-8350 - 265 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for €485 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8350 | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |