Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of FX-8350
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €285.00 vs €434.79
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 82% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8350 - 162 vs 89 FPS
- Up to 16% better value when playing Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than FX-8350 - €2.68 vs €3.20 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€434.79
65%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €434.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 248 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8350 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |