Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 4011 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of FX-8350
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - €285.00 vs €414.00
- Up to 9% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700K - €1.70 vs €1.87 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 32% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8350 - 221 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 28 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Buy for €414 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 231 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8350 | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |