Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 54 days older than Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |