Buy on Amazon
€50.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 4800HS outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 4800HS is 1098 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 122 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 7 4800HS
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Renoir | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Radeon Graphics 448SP | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
