Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €84.44 vs €271.25
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-10700F - €0.63 vs €1.98 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 2600 - 137 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 16 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
133
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.63/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.98/FPS
31%
Price, €
€271.25
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €271.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |