Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1691 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 4% better in Sea of Thieves than Core i3-4130T - 227 vs 219 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600 - €30.28 vs €84.44
- Up to 62% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 5 2600 - €0.14 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1963 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
219
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1964 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |