Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2271 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Up to 63% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €30.28 vs €81.67
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 3000G - €0.17 vs €0.46 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130T - 178 vs 177 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
177
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Buy for €81.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130T | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Athlon |
Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |