Buy on Amazon
€84.44
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $199
Availability
MSRP in USD: $199
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Celeron B830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 2056 days newer than Celeron B830.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 14% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron B830 - 109 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B830 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron B830
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
109
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD YD2600BBAFBOX Processore Ryzen 5 2600 Socket AM4 3.9Ghz Max Boost, 3,4Ghz Base+19MB
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 5 2600
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Celeron B830
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Celeron B830 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2012 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket G2 (988B) |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
