Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 1105 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3900 - 118 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2500X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
112
94.91525423728814%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32771 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
52.67452402538532%
Multi-Core
992
26.098395159168643%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
