Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 2148 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than FX-6300 - 701 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
96.00570613409415%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32999 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |