Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 637 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €74.94 vs €455.01
- Up to 82% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i9-9900KF - €0.43 vs €2.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Warcraft than Ryzen 5 1600 - 192 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 16 vs 12 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
173
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15225 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.37/FPS
18%
Price, €
€455.01
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €455.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15225 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |