Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 637 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - €74.94 vs €158.88
- Up to 49% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-9400F - €0.42 vs €0.82 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than Ryzen 5 1600 - 194 vs 180 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
180
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15194 minutes ago
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15194 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |