Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 2906 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than FX-6350 - 125 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen 3 5300G
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
| Cezanne | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
