Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 2409 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 137 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 5300G - 20 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 5300G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 13th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Cezanne | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |