Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3550H is 2078 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6350 - 161 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen 5 3550H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3550H |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
