Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 497 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 125 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6350 - 160 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Vishera | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 135 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |