Buy on Amazon
€88.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200U outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200U is 2225 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
- Performs up to 4% better in New World than Celeron G1610 - 102 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 15 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
98
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 3 3200U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Picasso | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
