Buy on Amazon
€255.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 4417 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield V than Phenom X4 9650 - 246 vs 200 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i7-10700F processor 2.9 GHz 16 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 523 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom X4 9650
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
14.764267990074442%
Multi-Core
765
10.579449592034297%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Agena | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 11.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Phenom X4 9650 or Core i7-10700F
Battlefield V, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
28 FPS
€27.11/FPS
GeForce GT 710
Core i7-10700F
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€759
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
