Buy on Amazon
€50.95
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Phenom II X4 830 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2681 days newer than Phenom II X4 830.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 830
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Phenom II X4 830 - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 830 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€50.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80677G3930 Processore Celeron G3930, S 1151, Kaby Lake, Dual Core, 2 Thread, 2.9GHz, 2MB Cache, 1050MHz GPU, 51W, Argento
Buy for €50.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 118 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Phenom II X4 830
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2009
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 830 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Deneb | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
