Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Phenom II X4 810 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 2983 days newer than Phenom II X4 810.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 810
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than Phenom II X4 810 - 54 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 810 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 9th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 810 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Feb 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Deneb | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |